Good work starts
in the open.

Build with a team that lets you into the thinking. From the first question to the next release, see the work, understand the trade-offs, and help shape what happens next.

A business
problem
Software you can take forward

What working together should feel like

You bring the context.
We bring the craft.
We make the decisions together.

Our software development process connects discovery, scope, implementation, validation, and handover. The sequence adapts to the project. Visibility and clear responsibility stay part of the work.

That means discussing the difficult dependency, showing an unfinished workflow, and saying when a smaller first release makes more sense.

Inside a project

Less to imagine.
More to look at.

Explore the kinds of artifacts we can agree for your engagement. This order-management example shows how a question becomes working software.

Illustrative examples. Actual artifacts depend on scope.
01 / project briefSample artifact
Project briefOrder operations / working draftFor discussion

Give operations one place to review an order.

Observed friction
Order updates move between spreadsheets and messages.
Who needs it
The operations lead and the people handling exceptions.
What to learn
Which system owns the record? What changes after approval?

Open questionMap an exception with the team before defining the workflow.

The process, in detail

01Understand the real problem

We start with the people, workflow, and constraints. We separate the outcome you need from assumptions about features or technology.

  • Problem and user context
  • System boundaries and dependencies
  • Risks and decisions requiring investigation

Decision to makeAgree on the problem and whether discovery is needed.

02Define a reviewable first scope

We shape the work around an end-to-end journey. Scope, exclusions, acceptance criteria, and responsibilities become explicit before implementation expands.

  • Prioritized scope and exclusions
  • Acceptance scenarios
  • Estimate assumptions and decision owners

Decision to makeApprove the first delivery boundary and commercial terms.

03Build with a short feedback loop

We demonstrate working increments, raise dependencies, and record decisions. Feedback changes the next priorities without hiding its effect on scope or timing.

  • Working software or configured workflows
  • Review notes and resolved decisions
  • Updated backlog and visible blockers

Decision to makeAccept the increment or identify what must change.

04Validate the operating reality

Testing follows the actual use case: roles, data, integrations, failure paths, and recovery. Business owners review representative scenarios before the release decision.

  • Relevant test and acceptance results
  • Open issue assessment
  • Deployment and recovery plan

Decision to makeConfirm readiness or resolve the remaining release blockers.

05Release and transfer ownership

We agree on rollout responsibilities and hand over the knowledge needed to operate the system. Support, improvement work, and response expectations are scoped explicitly.

  • Release and operating notes
  • Access and repository handover
  • Support boundary and next priorities

Decision to makeConfirm ownership and the next period of support or development.

Different work. Different evidence.

“It works” needs
a better definition.

A product, an AI workflow, and an ERP implementation need different kinds of validation. The right test starts with the business risk.

Product / What we validate

Can someone complete the job?

Start with a real user journey. Review usability, permissions, integrations, and failure paths before widening the feature set.

A representative acceptance check

A representative user completes the intended task in the test environment.

Explore product development

One team around the work

A rhythm that keeps you in the picture.

01 / Align

Agree the next increment.

02 / Make

Build, test, raise questions.

03 / Review

Walk through the work.

Your side

Context, priority, and acceptance.

Our side

Options, build, and handover.

The conversation that matters

Can we add one more thing?

Often, yes. First, we show what it changes. New work has an impact on scope, dependencies, timing, or cost. Together, we choose the path.

01

Swap

Keep the boundary. Change the priority.

Replace an agreed item with the new request after reviewing the impact.

02

Extend

Expand the scope deliberately.

Agree on the additional work, estimate, and approval before it starts.

03

Defer

Keep the idea. Protect this release.

Record it in the backlog with the reason and the condition for revisiting it.

Scope and budget owners approve the decision before dependent work proceeds.

A shape that fits the work

Start where you actually are.

A new idea, an active roadmap, and a stuck project call for different beginnings. Choose the situation closest to yours.

Discovery, then focused delivery

You have a business goal, but the user journey, scope, or system boundaries still need decisions.

Talk about this starting point

Embedded squad

Your team owns the product direction and needs additional engineering capacity with clear responsibility.

Talk about this starting point

Focused review or fractional CTO support

Progress has stalled, technical decisions need review, or a launch depends on resolving a specific risk.

Talk about this starting point

After the first release

The keys, and the knowledge to use them.

Ownership is something to plan early. Agree on source code, access, intellectual property, and third-party licenses in the engagement terms. Then make the handover useful to the people taking over.

01

Run it

Environment setup, deployment, monitoring, and recovery notes.

02

Understand it

Architecture decisions, dependencies, and known limitations.

03

Move it forward

A prioritized backlog, named owners, and agreed support boundaries.

Meet the company behind the work

Before you commit

Good questions. Clear answers.

Scope, ownership, access, and support deserve a conversation before work begins.

How does a software project with PySquad start?

We begin with the business goal, existing systems, constraints, and decision owners. If important questions remain unresolved, a focused discovery or technical review helps define the first scope before a broader implementation commitment.

What do we need before requesting an estimate?

Bring a representative workflow, intended users, existing systems, target timing, and the people who can make decisions. An estimate should state scope, exclusions, dependencies, and assumptions. An incomplete brief can be clarified together.

How often will we review progress?

Agree on a review cadence at kickoff. For embedded squads, weekly roadmap and delivery checkpoints keep priorities and progress connected. Working demonstrations and written decisions keep progress visible between calls.

How are scope changes handled?

Record the request, explain its impact, and choose whether to swap an existing priority, extend the agreed scope, or defer it. The people responsible for scope and budget approve the decision before dependent work proceeds.

Do you work alongside an in-house engineering team?

Yes. Define who owns product decisions, architecture, implementation, environments, and release approval. An embedded squad should fit into those responsibilities with a shared backlog and clear handover boundaries.

Who owns the source code and project access?

Ownership, intellectual property, repository access, accounts, and handover responsibilities must be agreed in the engagement terms. Identify third-party services and licenses separately so your team understands what it can operate and maintain.

How quickly can work begin?

The start date depends on scope alignment, team availability, contracting, and access readiness. Confirm a realistic date after those inputs are known, rather than assuming the first call starts implementation.

Is ongoing support included?

Confirm support separately in the engagement scope, including coverage, response expectations, issue ownership, and change requests. Launch support and long-term product development may require different arrangements.

There is a useful next step

Put the problem on the table.

Tell us what needs to change, what you have tried, and what is getting in the way. We can work out the right starting point together.

Discuss your projectNext: add your context in the enquiry form.

A little closer, wherever you are

Big world.
Close partnership.

Product engineering, AI and Odoo ERP, with a shared plan and a working rhythm built around your team.

IndiaSpainFrance
Our offices Customer presence

Different time zones. One shared vision.

Explore our global presence